Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

C.G.S. § 53a-119b — Using a Motor Vehicle or Vessel Without Permission; Interfering or Tampering With a Motor Vehicle

Plain-English Overview Using a Motor Vehicle or Vessel Without Permission

This law covers two broad situations: (1) driving/using someone else’s car or a boat without their permission (often called “joyriding”), and (2) starting, damaging, or removing parts from a car without the owner’s permission. A first offense is a Class A misdemeanor; any subsequent offense is a Class D felony.

What the State Must Prove

Prosecutors can charge you under this statute if they claim you:

  1. Used a motor vehicle without the owner’s permission, or
  2. Used a vessel (boat) without the owner’s permission, or
  3. Interfered/tampered with a motor vehicle, which includes:
    • Starting the engine of a standing vehicle without permission, or
    • Intentionally damaging the vehicle or removing/damaging its parts.
Penalties
  • First offense: Class A misdemeanor (up to 364 days jail, fines, probation).
  • Each subsequent offense: Class D felony (up to 5 years prison, higher fines, probation).

Note: Prior convictions that enhance penalties are usually handled in a separate “Part B” information after a guilty verdict on the new case.

Common Real-World Scenarios
  • Borrowing without asking: You take a roommate’s car for “a quick errand” and get stopped before returning it.
  • Key left in ignition: You hop into a running car outside a store and drive it around the block.
  • Tampering: You start a parked car to “test it,” or remove a catalytic converter or stereo components.
  • Boats: You take a neighbor’s jet ski out “for a spin” without clear permission.
Defenses We Often Use
  • Permission / reasonable belief of permission: Texts, prior usage patterns, or mixed messages can create reasonable doubt about consent.
  • Identity / attribution: Video angle, lighting, or partial plate may not prove who actually used or started the vehicle.
  • No “tampering” intent: Hands on a door handle ≠ starting the engine or damaging/removing parts.
  • Value & damage disputes: If parts were never removed or damage is unproven, the “tampering” element can fail.
  • Suppression issues: Stops, searches, and identifications must meet constitutional standards.
AR Program (Path to Dismissal)

For many first-time, low-risk clients, Accelerated Rehabilitation (AR) can be a practical route to dismissal and erasure. We prepare a tight mitigation packet (employment proof, restitution for any damage, counseling if appropriate) and argue risk-reduction and accountability. The judge decides after hearing from the prosecutor and any listed victim; successful completion ends with dismissal and erasure. (Eligibility and terms are case-specific.)

Related Connecticut Offenses (With Statute Numbers)“How This Looks in Real Life” — Quick ExamplesGuilty (Likely):

1) Joyride: Teen takes neighbor’s SUV at night without asking; stopped by police 20 minutes later.

2) Engine start: Person starts a parked BMW to move it off a driveway “as a joke.” Owner didn’t consent.

3) Parts removal: Two people jack up a car and cut off the catalytic converter.

Borderline / Reducible:

4) Mixed messages: Coworker regularly “borrows” the company van; boss later calls police after a dispute. Prior texts/emails suggest implied permission—often leads to a reduction or dismissal with restitution.

Not Guilty (Plausible):

5) Mistaken identity: Security footage shows a similar jacket/hat, but timestamps and phone location data show the client was elsewhere; case dismissed.

What to Do Right Now (if You’ve Been Contacted or Arrested)
  • Don’t make statements about permission or intent—let your lawyer speak.
  • Preserve evidence: Texts, DMs, prior usage history, key access, surveillance clips.
  • Insurance/repairs: If damage is alleged, document estimates and repairs for mitigation.
  • Call early: Fast, organized presentation can mean diversion or a straight dismissal.
Protect Your Future Now!

Charged under C.G.S. § 53a-119b or being investigated? Call 203-357-5555 to Speak with Attorney Allan Freidman or reach us through our Contact Page for a confidential strategy session. For a broader overview of the arraignment, bond, and case process, see our Criminal Defense Home Page.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous