Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

Burglary in the First Degree (C.G.S. § 53a-101)

Why Connecticut treats first-degree burglary so seriously—and how I defend these casesIntroduction Burglary in the First Degree

If you or a loved one was arrested for Burglary in the First Degree (C.G.S. § 53a-101), you’re facing one of Connecticut’s toughest non-homicide felonies. I’ve defended these cases for over 30 years. Below I explain the elements, penalties, and defenses—with the exact statutes you’ll hear in court.

What the State Must Prove (Elements)

Under C.G.S. § 53a-101(a), the State must prove both:

  1. You entered or remained unlawfully in a building (definitions in § 53a-100), and
  2. You intended to commit a crime inside (any crime—not just larceny),

plus one of the following aggravators (§ 53a-101(a)(1)–(3)):

  • Armed aggravator — § 53a-101(a)(1): You were armed with explosives, a deadly weapon, or a dangerous instrument (see Penal Code definitions in § 53a-3).
  • Injury aggravator — § 53a-101(a)(2): You intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly caused or attempted to cause physical injury to another (“physical injury” in § 53a-3).
  • Nighttime dwelling aggravator — § 53a-101(a)(3): The building is a dwelling and the entry/remaining occurred at night (“building,” “dwelling,” and “night” in § 53a-100; “night” is the period from 30 minutes after sunset to 30 minutes before sunrise).

Plain-English notes:

  • “Unlawfully” means you lacked license or privilege to be there (§ 53a-100). Prior permission (key/invitation) matters.
  • Intent can be inferred from conduct, but the State still must prove you planned to commit some crime inside.
Penalties & Collateral Consequences
  • Class B felony (§ 53a-101(b); ranges in § 53a-35a): up to 20 years imprisonment.
  • Fine up to $15,000 (§ 53a-41).
  • Mandatory minimum: If the armed aggravator is proven, five years of the sentence may not be suspended (§ 53a-101(c)).
  • Probation is possible in non-mandatory scenarios, but expect strict conditions.
  • Family-violence overlay: If a family/household member is involved, the case goes to the family-violence docket with immediate protective orders (framework in § 46b-38a et seq.).

Program reality check: As charged, Burglary 1st is generally not eligible for AR or FVEP. Strategy often focuses on defeating an aggravator or reducing to a program-eligible offense (see § 53a-102, § 53a-103, § 53a-107).

Why Connecticut Is So Strict

High-profile home-entry crimes pushed lawmakers to elevate penalties where people and homes are at risk. That’s why nighttime entries into dwellings and weapon/injury scenarios trigger § 53a-101(a)(1)–(3), and why Home Invasion (§ 53a-100aa) exists as a separate, harsher Class A felony. Prosecutors often file § 53a-101 when they see a dwelling/weapon/injury factor but the added elements of Home Invasion aren’t met.

Common Real-World Scenarios
  • Domestic misunderstandings: Using an old key or “just getting my things” after a breakup can become unlawful remaining—and if it’s at night in a dwelling, § 53a-101(a)(3) is in play.
  • No theft, still burglary: The statute requires intent to commit a crime inside, not necessarily stealing (§ 53a-101(a)).
  • Misidentification/video gaps: Doorbell footage can be ambiguous; identity and timing are frequent battlegrounds.
Defense Strategies That Work 1) Attack “Unlawful” Entry/Remaining (§ 53a-100).

License/privilege (invitation, shared residence, key) undercuts a core element. If permission was revoked, when and by whom matters.

2) Challenge Intent(§ 53a-101(a)).

Retrieving property or seeking a conversation isn’t automatic criminal intent. Messages, location data, and witness context can rebut the State’s theory.

3) Knock Out the Aggravator (§ 53a-101(a)(1)–(3)).
  • Weapon/dangerous instrument (§ 53a-3): Was there a qualifying weapon? Was it on you during the entry/remaining? Was a common object truly used/threatened in a way “capable of causing death or serious physical injury”?
  • Injury: Was harm accidental or minimal? Did it occur later or elsewhere?
  • Nighttime dwelling: Is it legally a “dwelling”? Was it legally “night”? Minutes matter.
4) Suppress Tainted Evidence.

Flawed searches or ID procedures can be challenged. Suppression leverage often drives charge reductions.

5) Reframe to a Lesser Offense.

Domestic-context/no-injury cases frequently resolve to Burglary 2nd/3rd (§ 53a-102/-103) or Criminal Trespass 1st (§ 53a-107), opening doors to more lenient outcomes—and sometimes program eligibility.

Domestic-Violence Overlay (if Applicable)

If the complainant is a family or household member (§ 46b-38a), the case proceeds on the family-violence docket with immediate protective orders and a Family Relations interview at the first appearance (§ 46b-38c procedures). Early compliance and a strong mitigation package help us seek order modifications and charge reductions.

Related Offenses (Quick List)What to Do Right Now
  1. Do not contact the complainant; follow all protective orders.
  2. Preserve evidence (texts, call logs, rides, doorbell/smart-home video, location history).
  3. Write a timeline while it’s fresh (who invited you, why you went, what you intended to do).
  4. Call a lawyer early. The first two court dates shape bond, orders, and the charging narrative.
Frequently Asked QuestionsDo I Have to Steal Something to Be Charged With Burglary?

No. The statute requires unlawful entry/remaining plus intent to commit any crime inside (§ 53a-101(a)).

What Counts as “Night” and “Dwelling”?

“Night” and “dwelling” are defined for burglary (§ 53a-100). If timing or the nature of the structure is borderline, we litigate it.

Is There a Mandatory Minimum?

Yes—if the armed aggravator is proven, five years of any sentence may not be suspended (§ 53a-101(c)).

Can Burglary 1st Be Reduced?

Often. We target the aggravator/intent and negotiate to § 53a-102, § 53a-103, or § 53a-107, where appropriate.

What if I Had a Key or Was Invited Before?

Prior license or privilege matters (§ 53a-100). If permission wasn’t clearly revoked, the State’s “unlawful” element is weak.

Will I Go to Jail at the First Court Date?

Usually the court addresses bond and protective orders first. Strong mitigation and compliance can keep you out while the case proceeds.

Can I Contact the Accuser to “Clear Things Up”?

No. That risks violating protective orders and creating new charges (§ 53a-223). Let your lawyer communicate through proper channels.

How Does This Affect Immigration or Professional Licenses?

Felony allegations—especially violent Class B felonies—can create serious immigration and licensing problems. Early negotiation and charge reduction are critical.

Will a Dismissed or Reduced Case Still Show Up Online?

Often yes, via third-party sites. We can discuss post-disposition record-sealing and reputation management options after the case outcome.

How Fast Should I Hire a Lawyer, and What Should I Bring?

Immediately. Bring your timeline, messages, call logs, photos/videos, location history, and names of any witnesses.

Talk to a Stamford Burglary Defense Lawyer

If you’re facing Burglary in the First Degree (C.G.S. § 53a-101), call Allan F. Friedman, Criminal Lawyer at 203-357-5555 for a free, confidential consultation. | Call: 203-357-5555

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous