Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

C.G.S. § 53a-128g — Receipt of Money, Goods, or Services Obtained by Illegal Use of a Payment Card

Definition & Elements (Receiving Goods From Credit Card Fraud) Receipt of Money, Goods, or Services Obtained by Illegal Use of a Payment Card

This law targets the receiving side of payment-card fraud. If someone uses a stolen/cloned/unauthorized card to buy things, the person who later receives those things (or the money/services) knowing they came from that illegal card use can be charged under § 53a-128g. The State often proves knowledge through circumstances—rock-bottom prices, bulk brand-new goods, rushed cash sales, or “don’t ask questions” deals.

What the State Must Prove

To convict, prosecutors generally have to show:

  1. Money, goods, or services were obtained by illegal use of a payment card;
  2. You received that money, goods, or services; and
  3. You knew they were obtained through illegal payment-card use (knowledge can be shown by circumstantial evidence—think suspicious price, condition, or story).
Key Definitions
  • Payment card: credit or debit card.
  • Issuer: bank or company that issues the card.
  • Cardholder: person authorized by the issuer to use the card.
  • Illegal use: using a card or card number without authorization (stolen, cloned, forged, or obtained by fraud).
Penalties

§ 53a-128g is punished under § 53a-128i using value-based tiers (the higher the total value received, the more serious the charge). Exposure can range from a misdemeanor up to a felony, along with restitution and probation. Prior records and related counts can increase risk.

Common Police Evidence in These Cases
  • Store surveillance, POS logs, chargeback records, and shipping labels.
  • Phone/laptop messages showing quick resale, bulk orders, or price negotiations.
  • Marketplace postings (Facebook, OfferUp, Telegram, Discord) and cash-app/crypto trails.
  • New-in-box goods with tags/receipts that don’t match your story or timeline.
  • Statements made in “consensual” interviews.
Defenses & How We Fight
  • No knowledge: You didn’t know (and the facts don’t reasonably suggest) the items were tied to card fraud.
  • Not from a payment card crime: The property wasn’t connected to illegal card use at all.
  • Value disputes: We challenge valuation to reduce penalty tiers.
  • Identification & possession: Who actually received/possessed the goods? Is it traceable to you?
  • Suppression: We attack unlawful searches, overbroad warrants, and unreliable digital evidence.
  • Good-faith purchase: Ordinary, market-price purchase with normal documentation cuts against knowledge.
4 Examples (The 4th Shows a Lawful Boundary)
  1. The “great deal” sneakers
    A friend offers you ten pairs of brand-new, high-end sneakers at half price, still in shrink-wrap, “no questions.” You pay cash and flip them online the same day. Later, the store reverses chargebacks tied to those SKUs. Prosecutors say the price/condition/story show you knew they came from card fraud. That’s § 53a-128g risk.
  2. Consoles and gift cards
    You accept three sealed game consoles and a stack of high-value gift cards as repayment for a debt. No receipts, urgent resale. Card networks flag the gift cards as bought on a stolen card hours earlier. Receiving them with those red flags can trigger § 53a-128g.
  3. Package drop “helper”
    You let someone ship “inventory” to your apartment. You sign for boxes of new electronics and hand them off in a parking lot for $200 per drop. Retailers later show the orders were placed with cloned card numbers. Even if you never swiped a card, receiving the goods under those circumstances fits § 53a-128g.
  4. Lawful boundary: normal second-hand buy
    You buy a used iPhone at a typical market price. Seller shows ID, provides a matching box and bill of sale, and the device passes activation/Find My checks. Nothing suggests card fraud. On these facts, prosecutors would struggle to prove you knew it came from illegal payment-card use.
Related Offenses (Often Stacked)What to Do Right Now
  • Do not make statements or “explain” anything to detectives.
  • Do not consent to searches of phones, laptops, vehicles, or storage.
  • Preserve receipts, chats, shipping labels, IMEIs/serials, and marketplace records.
  • Stop all resale activity immediately and get counsel to contact the issuer/retailer if needed.
Strong Call to Action

Charged or under investigation for § 53a-128g anywhere in Connecticut? Call Allan F. Friedman Criminal Lawyer at (203) 357-5555 or use our online contact page for a fast, confidential consultation. I defend payment-card and financial-crime cases statewide and step in early to control surrender, protect your record, and challenge the evidence before it snowballs. For more information please review our criminal defense page.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous