Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

C.G.S. § 14-215(c) - Operating Under DUI-Related Suspension / IID Restriction

Operating Under DUI-Related Suspension Charge Snapshot

This charge applies when you drive while your license is suspended, revoked, or restricted because of a DUI/OUI, test refusal/failure, or an IID requirement—and you’re not in full compliance (for example, you’re driving a vehicle without a required interlock). Courts treat it as defying a safety order, so penalties are tough and include mandatory jail in many situations.

Elements (What the State Must Prove)
  1. You operated a motor vehicle;
  2. At that time, your license/privilege was suspended, revoked, or restricted for a DUI-related reason (including IID-only driving); and
  3. You knew or should have known about that status/restriction.
Penalties & Exposure
  • Classification: Typically Class A misdemeanor under 14-215(c).
  • First offense: 30-day mandatory minimum jail (up to 1 year total), $500–$1,000 fine.
  • Second offense: 120-day mandatory minimum jail, up to 1 year; fines.
  • Third or subsequent: 1-year mandatory minimum jail; fines.
  • Plus DMV: Additional suspension time, and IID terms can be extended.Note: Courts can sometimes find mitigating circumstances that allow relief from the mandatory minimum, but you should never assume it.
How These Cases Get Built
  • DMV status printouts (showing suspension/revocation/IID restriction).
  • Police reports and bodycam from the stop (why you were pulled over).
  • Proof the vehicle had no IID when one was required.
  • Prior DUI/refusal records, prior 14-215(c) convictions, and IID vendor logs.
  • Statements made roadside (admissions about knowing you were restricted).
Defenses & Strategies
  • Status error: DMV database mistake; suspension already lifted; notice not properly sent.
  • Restriction confusion: Reasonable misunderstanding about which vehicle(s) required IID.
  • Necessity/mitigation narrative: Emergency facts, immediate corrective steps, proof of ongoing compliance—used to seek non-jail outcomes or mitigation where allowed.
  • Motion practice: Challenge stop (no reasonable suspicion), suppress statements, tighten the record on knowledge/notice.
  • Damage control: Rapid IID installation across all driven vehicles; proof of transportation plan; employment and family anchors.
Diversion & Alternatives (AR and Creative Resolutions) Accelerated Rehabilitation (AR) Is Fact-Specific.

In order to qualify for AR for a violation of 15-215(C), you must have no prior criminal conviction of any kind; have not used the AR program I the last 10 years and you must not have driver a commercial vehicle or hold a CDL.

It’s not guaranteed in a mandatory-minimum motor-vehicle offense, but in select first-time, low-risk cases some courts will consider charge reductions or structured pleas to avoid mandatory jail—especially with strong mitigation (work/treatment records, perfect IID compliance going forward, community service, proof of hardship). The key is early, well-documented advocacy.

4 Real-World Examples (the 4th Is a Lawful Boundary)
  1. No IID in the “backup car” Your license is restored IID-only. Your main car has an IID; your older sedan doesn’t. You take the sedan to the store, get stopped. That’s 14-215(c) (and often 14-227k for IID avoidance).
  2. Test refusal + early driving After a refusal, you’re on a 45-day hard suspension. On day 18, you drive to work and get pulled over for a taillight. That’s operating under DUI-related suspension14-215(c) with a 30-day minimum.
  3. Out-of-state confusion Your home state reinstated you, but Connecticut did not and still shows a DUI-based suspension/IID restriction here. You’re stopped while driving in CT. Because CT controls CT roads, this can be 14-215(c).
  4. Lawful boundary: fully compliant IID driving You completed the 45-day suspension, paid fees, installed IID in every vehicle you operate, and you’re stopped for speeding. You are IID-compliant and restored → not a 14-215(c) violation (though you may still face the speeding ticket).
Related Offenses (Often Added or Alternative)What to Do Right Now
  • Do not drive until you confirm your exact DMV status.
  • If IID-restricted, ensure every vehicle you operate has a functioning IID.
  • Save all DMV letters, vendor logs, receipts, and installation reports.
  • Talk to a lawyer before making statements; early strategy can avoid months of extra suspension and mandatory jail.
  • Prepare mitigation: employment letters, family obligations, treatment/abstinence records, transportation plan.
Take Action Now!

Charged—or about to be charged—under C.G.S. § 14-215(c) anywhere in Connecticut? Call Allan F. Friedman Criminal Lawyer at (203) 357-5555. I move fast to challenge DMV status, protect your license, and pursue outcomes that avoid mandatory jail wherever the law allows.

FAQs — C.G.S. § 14-215(C) (8 Quick Answers) 1) Is Jail Automatic on a First 14-215(c)?

There’s a 30-day mandatory minimum. In limited cases, courts can find mitigating circumstances to avoid it—but you need strong, documented reasons and a solid plan.

2) I Had an IID in My Main Car, But I Drove My Spouse’s Car Without One. Is That Still a Crime?

Yes. If you’re IID-only, every vehicle you operate must have a functioning IID. Driving a non-IID car risks 14-215(c) and often 14-227k as well.

3) CT Says I’m Suspended, but My Home State Reinstated Me. Which Controls?

In Connecticut, CT DMV controls your privilege to drive in Connecticut. If CT shows a DUI-based suspension/IID restriction, driving here can violate 14-215(c) even if your home state says you’re fine.

4) Can AR or a Reduction Avoid the Mandatory Minimum?

Sometimes. It’s case-by-case. We often pursue a charge reduction or carefully structured plea. Strong mitigation (work, childcare, treatment, documented compliance) is critical.

5) Will This Extend My IID Time or Get Me Re-Suspended?

Often, yes. DMV can extend IID terms and re-suspend your privilege after a 14-215(c) event—separate from the criminal court.

6) Do I Have to Install IID in Every Car I Might Drive?

If you’re IID-restricted, install in every vehicle you will operate. Borrowing a “clean” car is a common trap that leads to new charges.

7) I Never Got the DMV Letter—Can I Still Be Convicted?

Possibly. The State can prove knowledge through various means (mailing records, prior notices, your statements). We scrutinize notice and the timing to create reasonable doubt.

8) How Do We Show Mitigating Circumstances?

We build a comprehensive packet: proof of employment and caregiving duties, perfect IID compliance going forward, transportation plan (rideshare, interlock installs), treatment records, and letters verifying community risk is low.

Protect Your License, Your Record, and Your Freedom

For aggressive, statewide defense of § 14-215(c), call Allan F. Friedman Criminal Lawyer at (203) 357-5555 or use my online contact page. Let’s lock down your DMV status, craft mitigation, and fight for an outcome that keeps you moving forward.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous