Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

C.G.S. § 53a-90a – Enticing a Minor

Understanding Enticing a Minor in Connecticut Enticing a Minor

Under Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-90a, it is a felony to use the Internet, a phone, text messages, social-media platforms, or any other electronic device to entice, recruit, solicit, or lure a person under sixteen to engage in sexual activity or indecent contact.

Police and prosecutors treat these cases very seriously, and many begin as online sting operations in which an undercover officer poses as a minor. Even when no real child is involved, the law allows prosecution if the accused believed they were communicating with someone under sixteen.

Elements of the Crime

To prove a violation of § 53a-90a, the State must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant:

  1. Used an electronic or interactive device such as a computer, phone, or social-media app;
  2. Knowingly enticed, solicited, recruited, or lured another person to engage in sexual activity; and
  3. Believed the other person was under sixteen years old, or the person actually was under sixteen.

It is not a defense that the “minor” was an undercover police officer.

Penalties

For most cases of Enticing a Minor under § 53a-90a, the offense is a Class B felony.
A Class B felony is punishable by one to twenty years in prison and a fine of up to $15,000.

If the alleged minor is under thirteen years old, the offense becomes a Class A felony, punishable by ten to twenty-five years in prison and a fine of up to $20,000.

In addition to incarceration and fines, a conviction can also lead to:

  • Mandatory sex-offender registration lasting from ten years to life;
  • Strict computer and Internet-use restrictions during probation or parole;
  • Electronic monitoring and unannounced searches of digital devices; and
  • Severe collateral consequences, including job loss, professional-license suspension, and housing restrictions.
Possible Defenses

Every case is fact-specific, but common defenses include:

  • Lack of intent or mistaken age: The accused reasonably believed the other person was over sixteen.
  • Entrapment: Law enforcement pressured or induced conduct that otherwise would not have occurred.
  • No sexual intent: Messages or chats never contained a genuine plan to meet or engage in sexual acts.
  • Illegal search or seizure: Digital evidence may have been collected without a valid warrant.
  • Insufficient proof: Screenshots and chat transcripts can be incomplete, altered, or taken out of context.

An experienced defense lawyer can examine the digital forensics, subpoena service providers, and challenge how the evidence was obtained.

Collateral Consequences

A conviction under § 53a-90a carries lifetime stigma. It can trigger sex-offender registration, permanent Internet restrictions, federal investigation exposure, and severe limits on employment, housing, and travel. Because the stakes are so high, prompt representation is essential.

Related StatutesCall a Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyer

If you or someone you love has been charged under C.G.S. § 53a-90a for Enticing a Minor, speak with a lawyer immediately—before talking to investigators or consenting to a device search.

Call sex crimes lawyer Allan F. Friedman, Criminal Lawyer, at (203) 357-5555 for a confidential consultation, or visit our contact page to schedule your case review today.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous