Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

C.G.S. § 53a-72b — Sexual Assault in the Third Degree with a Firearm

What This Charge Really Means (In Plain English) Sexual Assault in the Third Degree with a Firearm

Connecticut treats “with a firearm” versions of sex offenses especially seriously. Section 53a-72b is the firearm-enhanced version of Sexual Assault 3rd Degree. The State doesn’t have to prove a gun was fired—only that a firearm was used to threaten, display, or otherwise further the assault (or that the complainant reasonably believed you had one).

The Legal Blueprint (Elements the State Must Prove)

To convict under § 53a-72b, prosecutors generally must show:

  • The underlying conduct meets Sexual Assault in the Third Degree (§ 53a-72a)—for example, sexual contact obtained by force, or with someone unable to consent; and
  • A firearm factor: you displayed or threatened to use a firearm, possessed one and used it to further the crime, or caused the person to reasonably believe you had one.
Penalties & Collateral Consequences
  • Felony level: Usually a Class C felony; if the complainant is under 16, it elevates to a Class B felony.
  • Mandatory time: Statute requires two years that cannot be suspended, plus enough special parole so the total equals 10 years (court sets the mix of prison + special parole within the felony range).
  • Exposure: Class C felonies carry up to 10 years; Class B up to 20, with fines and probation possible.
  • Registration: This offense generally triggers sex-offender registration under Chapter 969; duration and category depend on case specifics. Many defendants face at least 10 years of registration, and some circumstances can require longer.
Common Ways the Firearm Piece Gets Alleged
  • A gun is shown during an encounter to compel compliance.
  • A statement like “I have a gun—do what I say,” even if no gun is seen.
  • The complainant reasonably believes a gun is present based on words, gestures, or context.
Defenses & Pressure Points I Look For
  • Consent / state of mind: Whether words, messages, witnesses, or context contradict force or coercion.
  • No firearm nexus: Maybe there was no display, threat, or reasonable belief of a gun—dropping the firearm enhancement can drastically change the case.
  • Identification / credibility: Inconsistencies, delayed reports, or motive-to-fabricate issues.
  • Illegal searches / statements: Suppress phone extractions, home/car searches, or custodial statements taken without proper warnings.
  • Overcharge checks: Facts that fit § 53a-72a (3rd) without the firearm piece—or even § 53a-73a (4th)—can support negotiating down.
4 Examples (to Make it Concrete)
  1. Parking-lot threat: During non-consensual touching, a person says “I’ve got a gun—don’t move,” while gripping a waistband. No gun is found later. The words alone can satisfy the firearm element if the threat caused reasonable belief.
  2. Shown handle in a car: In the course of forced sexual contact, a handle is shown from a console to intimidate. That display can qualify.
  3. Texted intimidation: Minutes before meeting, a message says “I’m armed; don’t fight me.” If the encounter involves sexual contact by force/coercion, that prior statement may satisfy the firearm-in-furtherance piece.
  4. Lawful boundary (not 53a-72b): Two consenting adults engage in sexual contact; one lawfully carries but never uses the gun to coerce, threaten, or influence consent, and the other person doesn’t believe a gun is involved. On these facts, the firearm enhancement shouldn’t apply.
Can the AR (Accelerated Rehabilitation) Program Ever Help Here?

AR is a discretionary diversion program for cases “not of a serious nature.” It’s not available for Class A or B felonies, and Class C felonies are only sometimes considered—and courts are extremely cautious with sex-offense allegations. In practice, eligibility on a § 53a-72b Class C case (adult complainant) is rare and hotly contested; Class B versions (under-16) are not AR-eligible. Even when technically possible, judges often deny AR in firearm-tagged sex cases. A thorough, fact-specific review is essential before you pin hopes on AR.

What to Do Right Now
  • Do not contact the complainant. Protective-order violations can be worse than the underlying case.
  • Preserve evidence: Messages, location data, rideshare receipts, surveillance leads, witness names.
  • Get counsel early: Contact a Connecticut criminal defense attorney as soon as you hear from the police. Early motions (to preserve video, limit statements, challenge searches) can change leverage fast.
  • Build mitigation: Treatment, stable employment, community supports—these matter at bail and in negotiation.
Related Offenses (for Context)Talk to a Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyer

A firearm-tagged sex charge is high-stakes. The sooner we review the warrant, statements, digital evidence, and any medical/forensic records, the more options you’ll have. Call Allan F. Friedman, Criminal Lawyer at 203-357-5555 for a confidential case review. We’ll map your defenses, protect your rights, and pursue the best possible outcome.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous