Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

C.G.S. § 53a-103a – Burglary in the Third Degree With a Firearm

Arrested for Burglary 3rd with a Firearm? Call 203-357-5555 for a free, confidential consultation. For more information on the arraignment, bond, and case process, consult our Criminal Defense home page.

Overview Burglary in the Third Degree With a Firearm

You can be charged with Burglary in the Third Degree with a Firearm when you commit Burglary 3rd (§ 53a-103)—entering or remaining unlawfully in a building with intent to commit a crime inside—and, during the offense, you use, are armed with and threaten the use of, display, or represent (by words or conduct) that you possess a firearm. It is a Class D felony with a mandatory minimum of 1 year that cannot be suspended.

What the Prosecutor Must Prove

To convict under § 53a-103a, the State must show:

  1. Burglary 3rd: You entered or remained unlawfully in a building with intent to commit a crime inside; and
  2. Firearm element: In the course of the burglary, you used, threatened the use of, displayed, or represented that you had a firearm.

The State does not need to prove the intended crime was completed—intent inside plus the firearm element is enough.

Penalties
  • Class D felony
  • Mandatory minimum: 1 year incarceration not suspendable
  • Maximum: up to 5 years incarceration; up to $5,000 fine; possible probation
  • Collateral impacts: immigration, employment/licensing, housing, firearm rights
Common Real-World Scenarios
  • After-hours entry into a warehouse, and when confronted by security, the person puts a hand on the waistband and says “I’ve got a gun.”
  • Unlawful entry into a storage facility; the person shows what appears to be a pistol to scare off a witness.
  • Breaking into a closed shop to take cash; the person displays a handgun to a clerk who unexpectedly returns.
Illustrative Case ExamplesCase 1 — “Don’t Move, I’ve Got a Gun” (Fits § 53a-103a)

Unlawful entry into a locked garage to steal tools; when spotted, the person claims to have a gun.Why it fits: Burglary 3rd + representation of a firearm.

Case 2 — Flashing a Pistol During a Back-Office Grab (Fits § 53a-103a)

Unlawful entry to a closed store; a handgun is displayed when confronted.Why it fits: Burglary 3rd + display of a firearm.

Case 3 — Concealed Carry, No Words or Display (May Not Fit 103a)

Unlawful entry to steal, but the firearm is never used, threatened, displayed, or represented.Why not: Still Burglary 3rd (§ 53a-103), but firearm element not proven for 103a.

Case 4 — Daytime Shoplifting in an Open Store (Not Burglary)

Walks in during business hours and steals without prior exclusion.Why not: Entry was lawful; this is a theft case, not burglary.

Case 5 — Trespass Without Crime Intent (Not Burglary)

Inside a closed warehouse after hours, but proof shows no intent to commit a crime.Why not: At most Criminal Trespass.

Defense Angles That Work
  • No unlawful entry/remaining: Open hours, permission, or lack of notice defeats the “unlawful” element.
  • No criminal intent inside: Tools/behavior/statements don’t support intent to commit a crime.
  • Firearm element fails: No use/threat/display/representation tied to the burglary; ambiguous gestures or non-firearm objects.
  • Identity & proof issues: Weak video, unreliable eyewitnesses, contaminated prints/DNA, questionable cell-site data.
  • Search & statements: Suppress unlawfully seized evidence or involuntary/confused statements.
  • Charge calibration: Push down to § 53a-103 (Burglary 3rd) or to trespass/theft-only where facts fit.
How These Cases Move Through Court
  1. Arraignment: bond and protective conditions; preserve surveillance/911 audio immediately.
  2. Discovery & Investigation: video canvass, forensic (prints/DNA), phone/tower data, property records, “building” status.
  3. Motions: suppress searches, exclude unreliable IDs, challenge the firearm proof.
  4. Negotiations vs. Trial: restitution, treatment (if relevant), mitigation to seek charge reduction from 103a → 103 or a targeted non-incarceration outcome.
  5. Disposition: structured plea, narrowly tailored sentencing, or trial.
Related OffensesFAQs1) Is 53a-103a a Felony?

Yes—Class D felony with a 1-year mandatory minimum that can’t be suspended.

2) Do They Have to Prove the Gun Was Real or Loaded?

Not necessarily. The statute covers use, threatened use, display, or representation of a firearm; details and credibility matter.

3) What if I Never Finished the Theft?

Completion isn’t required. Intent to commit a crime inside plus the firearm element is enough.

4) Does a Shed or Detached Garage Count as a “Building”?

Often yes, depending on structure and use. We scrutinize the statutory “building” definition.

5) I Shoplifted During Open Hours—Can That Be Burglary?

Generally no; lawful entry during open hours is typically larceny, not burglary.

6) What if It Was Only a Knife?

Then 103a doesn’t apply. It may still be Burglary 3rd (§ 53a-103) or another offense, but not with a firearm.

7) Can I Get Probation?

Possibly—but the 1-year mandatory minimum still applies. Outcomes depend on facts and history.

8) Can They Prove Intent Just Because I Was Inside?

They must show intent from circumstances (tools, behavior, statements). We attack weak inferences.

9) Is AR (Accelerated Rehabilitation) Possible?

AR is limited for firearm-enhanced burglaries; feasibility is highly fact- and court-specific.

10) How Long Will My Case Take?

Several months is common—video/forensics and motion practice drive the schedule.

Get Help Now

Facing Burglary 3rd with a Firearm (§ 53a-103a) is serious. Early strategy can be the difference between a mandatory-time felony and a reduced outcome.Call 203-357-5555 or use our online contact page to start your defense today.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous