Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-181e – Breach of the Peace in the Second Degree: Bias Crime
Understanding the Charge Normally, Breach of the Peace in the Second Degree (§ 53a-181) is a Class B misdemeanor. If the State claims you acted because of someone’s race, religion, ethnicity, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity/expression, the case is enhanced under § 53a-181e to a Class A misdemeanor. Prosecutors treat bias-flagged cases with special scrutiny, and the stigma can be worse than the sentence.
What the State Must ProveTo convict under § 53a-181e, the State must show you:
- Committed Breach of the Peace 2nd (threats, fighting/violent behavior, or disturbing conduct), and
- Did so maliciously and with the intent to intimidate or harass a person because of their protected status.
Penalties- Class A misdemeanor (elevated from Class B).
- Up to 1 year in jail, up to $2,000 in fines, probation.
- Courts commonly order bias-awareness education, counseling, and community service.
Real-World Examples Example 1: Bar Fight With Slurs (Appropriate Charge)During an argument at a bar, a man punches another patron while shouting racial insults. Because there’s violence plus bias motive, prosecutors file § 53a-181e rather than only simple assault/disorderly.
Example 2: Graffiti on a Synagogue (Appropriate Charge)A teen spray-paints hateful symbols on a synagogue wall. Even with minor property damage, the intent to intimidate on account of religion supports § 53a-181e.
Example 3: Street Threats (Appropriate Charge)A driver yells homophobic slurs and threatens to run over two pedestrians. Credible threat of violence + bias motive = § 53a-181e.
Example 4: Heated Argument Without Bias (Innocent Scenario)Two neighbors shout over a parking spot. No references to race, religion, or other protected status. This isn’t a bias crime. At most, it’s standard Breach of Peace (§ 53a-181) or Disorderly Conduct (§ 53a-182).
Defenses- No bias motive – The dispute was about something else (traffic, noise, money).
- Lack of specific intent – Words/actions were hot-headed, not aimed to intimidate because of a protected trait.
- First Amendment – Offensive speech alone (without true threats/illegal conduct) is generally protected.
- Mistaken identity / insufficient proof – The State must prove bias beyond a reasonable doubt.
Diversionary Option: AR (Accelerated Rehabilitation) for § 53a-181eYes—AR can be a path to dismissal in many bias-tagged breach-of-peace cases, especially for first-time defendants with clean records. AR is a pretrial diversion (under § 54-56e) the judge may grant in discretion after hearing from the prosecutor and, often, the complainant.
How AR Works- You apply; the court considers your record, conduct, seriousness, and public interest.
- If granted, you’ll complete conditions (typical in bias cases: anti-bias education, counseling, community service, no-contact, apology/impact work as advised by counsel).
- You’re supervised for a period (often 6–24 months).
- Successful completion = dismissal and erasure of the charge.
Practical Tips to Strengthen an AR Application- Start counseling/education early (bias-awareness, anger management if relevant).
- Collect character letters (employer, coach, professor, clergy).
- Document work/school stability and community ties.
- Show no prior similar incidents and genuine insight/remorse (without making legal admissions—coordinate with counsel).
- If appropriate, propose restorative/community service with a reputable organization.
Caveats: AR is not automatic. Prosecutors often oppose AR in bias-flagged cases. A tailored plan and strong advocacy can make the difference.
Collateral ConsequencesBeyond penalties, a conviction labeled a hate/bias crime can mean:
- Lasting reputation damage and employment/education barriers.
- Licensing and immigration complications.
- Community stigma that can outlive any sentence—another reason AR or dismissal matters.
Related Offenses- § 53a-181 – Breach of the Peace 2nd (base charge)
- § 53a-182 – Disorderly Conduct
- § 53a-181j/k/l – Intimidation Based on Bigotry or Bias (felony levels)
Frequently Asked Questions 1) Can I Get AR for a § 53a-181e Bias-Crime Charge?Often, yes—especially if you have no prior record. It’s discretionary and requires a strong plan (education/counseling/community service).
2) Is Offensive Speech Alone Enough for § 53a-181e?Generally no. The State needs threats, fighting/violent behavior, or disturbing conduct, plus bias intent.
3) Is § 53a-181e a Felony?No. It’s a Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year jail).
4) Will a Conviction Stay on My Record Forever?Yes—unless the case is dismissed (e.g., via AR) or you obtain later relief.
5) What if Alcohol Was Involved?Intoxication isn’t a defense, but it may help argue lack of targeted bias intent.
6) The Other Person Provoked Me—Does That Matter?Provocation helps explain context but does not excuse bias-motivated threats or violence.
7) Could My Social Media Be Used as Evidence?Yes. Posts, DMs, and comments may be offered to prove motive/intent—talk to counsel before deleting anything.
8) How Long Do These Cases Take?Several months is common; longer if litigated or if you pursue AR with conditions.
9) Will I Have to Take a Class if I’m Convicted or Get AR?Frequently yes—bias-awareness/education is common both as an AR condition and as a sentencing term.
10) Do I Really Need a Lawyer for a Misdemeanor?Absolutely. The “bias crime” label can impact your life far more than the statutory max. Skilled counsel can aim for AR, reduction, or dismissal.
Why You Need an Experienced Defense LawyerBias-tagged misdemeanors carry outsized consequences. I focus on killing the label—challenging motive evidence, humanizing clients, and building AR packages that satisfy the court’s safety and accountability concerns while protecting your future.
Take the Next StepCharged under C.G.S. § 53a-181e or worried your case may be flagged as a bias crime? Let’s talk strategy now—defense and AR planning work best early.
📞 Call Allan F. Friedman Criminal Lawyer at (203) 357-5555 or contact me online. I’ll evaluate eligibility for AR, map defenses, and fight for a clean result.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous