Close

C.G.S. § 53a-90b – Misrepresentation of Age to Entice a Minor

Understanding the Charge in Connecticut

Under Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-90b, it is a felony to lie about your age—typically online or by electronic communication—with the intent to entice, recruit, solicit, or lure a person under sixteen to engage in sexual activity or indecent contact.
This statute often appears alongside § 53a-90a (Enticing a Minor) in internet-sting cases.

Elements of the Crime

To prove a violation of § 53a-90b, the State must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant:

  1. Used an electronic or interactive device (e.g., computer, smartphone, text, app, social media, or similar service);
  2. Knowingly misrepresented their age to the other person;
  3. Did so with the intent to entice, recruit, solicit, or lure the other person to engage in sexual activity or indecent contact; and
  4. Believed the other person was under sixteen, or the person actually was under sixteen.

It is not a defense that the “minor” was an undercover officer posing as a child.

Penalties
  • Class C felony
  • Prison: up to 10 years (with potential mandatory portions depending on the case facts and companion counts)
  • Fine: up to $10,000
  • Probation: possible, often with strict conditions (no-contact orders, counseling, device/search conditions)

Collateral exposure: A conviction can trigger sex-offender registration and long-term restrictions on internet and device use, along with serious employment, licensing, and housing consequences.

Possible Defenses
  • No intent to entice. Chats lack a sexual aim or plan; no steps taken to meet.
  • Mistaken age / no knowledge. The defendant reasonably believed the person was 16+ and did not misstate age to gain access.
  • Entrapment. Law enforcement induced conduct that would not otherwise have occurred.
  • Unlawful search/seizure. Digital evidence seized or searched without a valid warrant or beyond warrant scope.
  • Insufficient proof. Incomplete logs, altered screenshots, or missing forensic foundations.

A strong defense typically includes forensic review of devices, subpoenas to service providers, and careful analysis of timeline and intent in the communications.

Collateral Consequences
  • Possible sex-offender registration and monitoring
  • Internet/device restrictions, surprise compliance checks
  • Professional and employment fallout; potential immigration consequences
  • No-contact orders and long-term supervision conditions
Related StatutesCall a Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyer

If you or a loved one has been arrested for Misrepresentation of Age to Entice a Minor (C.G.S. § 53a-90b), speak to a sex crimes lawyer before speaking to investigators or consenting to any device search.

Call Allan F. Friedman, Criminal Lawyer, at (203) 357-5555 for a confidential consultation and a defense strategy tailored to your case.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous
Contact Us
Click to Chat