Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-196e – Possessing Child Sexual Abuse Material in the Second Degree

What the Law Says

Teddy Bear AfraidUnder Connecticut General Statutes (C.G.S.) § 53a-196e, it is a crime to knowingly possess child sexual abuse material (CSAM) in the second degree.

The statute applies when a person:
  • Knowingly possesses at least 50 but fewer than 100 visual depictions of a minor under 16 years old engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
  • The material may be digital (phones, computers, storage devices), shared via messaging or social media, or physical (photographs, DVDs, printed material).
  • Importantly, the law does not require proof that the defendant created or distributed the material — possession alone is enough for prosecution.
Classification and Penalties

Possession of Child Sexual Abuse Material in the Second Degree is a Class C felony in Connecticut.

If convicted, penalties include:

  • 2-year mandatory minimum in prison
  • Up to 10 years in prison total
  • Fines up to $10,000
  • Probation with strict conditions (such as sex offender treatment, restrictions on internet use, electronic monitoring)
  • Mandatory sex offender registration — often the most damaging long-term consequence, affecting housing, employment, and reputation
  • The number of images or files plays a central role in how these cases are charged:
  • First Degree (§ 53a-196d): 100 or more depictions, or aggravated factors (repeat offender, child under 12, sadomasochistic images, etc.)
  • Second Degree (§ 53a-196e): Between 50 and 100 depictions
  • Third Degree (§ 53a-196f): Fewer than 50 depictions
Example Scenarios Example 1: Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Gone Wrong

A 20-year-old college student installs a peer-to-peer file sharing program to download movies. Unknown to him, some of the files contain CSAM. Police track the downloads through his IP address and execute a warrant. Investigators found 72 illegal images. He is charged under § 53a-196e (Second Degree) because the number of images falls between 50 and 100.

Example 2: Shared Family Computer

Police seize a family computer and find 55 explicit images of minors under 16. Because the father’s account was the primary user account, he is charged under § 53a-196e. His defense team argues multiple family members, including teens, had access, raising doubt about knowledge and control.

Example 3: Cell Phone Investigation

During an unrelated arrest, police seize a man’s smartphone. A forensic search reveals 88 files hidden in a vault app. He is charged with Possession in the Second Degree because the total is fewer than 100 but more than 50.

Example 4: Printed Photographs An individual is found with an envelope containing 60 photographs of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Even without electronic storage, possession of more than 50 images brings the case under Second Degree.

Example 5: Teenage Relationship

A 19-year-old exchanges explicit photos with his 15-year-old girlfriend. When police investigate, they discover 53 stored images on his phone. Even though the relationship was consensual, the possession of over 50 images leads to a Second Degree felony charge.

Related OffensesDefending Against § 53a-196e Charges

Defense strategies may include:

  • Lack of knowledge: Arguing the defendant didn’t know the files existed (auto-downloads, cached images).
  • Shared device access: Demonstrating others could have placed the files on the device.
  • Image classification disputes: Challenging whether certain images meet the statutory definition of CSAM.
  • Search and seizure violations: Suppressing evidence obtained through overbroad or unlawful warrants.
Frequently Asked Questions About § 53a-196e 1. How many images trigger a Second Degree charge?

Between 50 and 100 depictions of minors under 16.

2. What if There Are Fewer Than 50 Images?

That falls under Third Degree (§ 53a-196f), which is still a felony but carries lesser penalties.

3. What if There Are 100 or More Images?

That escalates to First Degree (§ 53a-196d), a Class B felony with harsher penalties.

4. Is There a Mandatory Minimum Sentence?

Yes. Second Degree carries a 2-year mandatory minimum prison sentence.

5. Will I Have to Register as a Sex Offender if Convicted?

Yes. Registration is mandatory and often lifelong.

Take the Next Step

Being charged with Possessing Child Sexual Abuse Material in the Second Degree (C.G.S. § 53a-196e) is extremely serious. With a 2-year mandatory minimum prison sentence, mandatory sex offender registration, and lasting collateral consequences, you need experienced legal representation immediately.

📞 Call Allan F. Friedman, Criminal Lawyer, at (203) 357-5555 or contact me through my contact page for a confidential consultation.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous