Justia Lawyer Rating
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2019 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Top Contributor Award 2017 - Allan F. Friedman
Avvo Rating badge 10.0 - Allan F. Friedman
Elite Lawyer badge - Allan Friedman
10 Best attorney badge
BBB badge
CTLA badge
STAMFORD Chamber of Commerce badge
Connecticut Bar Association badge

C.G.S. § 53a-128d — Illegal Use of a Credit/Debit Card

Plain-English Overview Illegal Use of a Credit/Debit Card

Under § 53a-128d, it’s a crime to use a payment card (credit or debit) you know is stolen, forged, revoked, expired, or otherwise unauthorized—or to use a card number without the cardholder’s consent—to obtain money, goods, services, or anything of value.

What Prosecutors Must Prove (Elements)

To convict, the State generally must show that you:

  1. Used a credit/debit card (or the card number) to obtain value;
  2. Knew the card/number was stolen, forged, revoked/expired, or used without the cardholder’s consent (or the card was obtained/kept in violation of § 53a-128c); and
  3. Acted with intent to obtain money, goods, services, or other value.
Penalties
  • Class A misdemeanor by default.
  • Class D felony if the total value obtained with the card/number exceeds $500 within any six-month period.
    Courts can also order restitution, probation, and technology/search conditions.
Common Real-World Scenarios
  • Using a found or borrowed card number saved in a phone/wallet app to buy merchandise.
  • Paying bills online with a former partner’s card after access was revoked.
  • Subscription/ride-share charges on a roommate’s card after moving out.
  • Entering a manually typed card number at checkout that was copied from a photo or receipt.
Evidence Police & Prosecutors Rely On
  • Merchant logs, POS video, IP/device fingerprints, and delivery records.
  • Card network chargebacks, bank fraud affidavits, and account notices (revoked/expired).
  • Texts/DMs/emails showing access to the card, number sharing, or “I used it, I’ll pay you back.”
  • App store/phone wallet history, screenshots, and autofill data.
Defenses That Often Move the Needle
  • Authorization/consent: Prior permission, shared accounts, or ambiguous revocation.
  • Knowledge/intent: You didn’t know the card was canceled/expired; believed you had authority.
  • Identity/attribution: Was it your device/account at the time? Shared phones and saved cards complicate attribution.
  • Valuation window: Challenging the $500/6-month aggregation (returns, reversals, partial credits).
  • Merchant/processor errors: Faulty card tokenization, duplicate transactions, or mis-applied credentials.
Illustrative Examples
  • Likely chargeable (misdemeanor): You use an old photo of a card to place a $140 food delivery after the cardholder told you not to—no large total.
  • Likely chargeable (felony): Over four months, multiple app purchases total $860 using an ex-partner’s saved card; consent was withdrawn.
  • Borderline/defense: You believed a shared family account still authorized you; transactions occurred before the cardholder actually revoked consent with the bank.
  • Not guilty potential: Merchant mis keyed a card number that happens to match digits you texted (not a payment card); logs don’t tie your device to the transaction.
Related Connecticut OffensesFAQs 1) Does This Statute Cover Debit Cards and Card Numbers?

Yes. “Credit card” statutes broadly cover payment cards and card numbers used to obtain value.

2) What if the Card Once Belonged to a Shared Account?

Past sharing isn’t permanent authorization. If consent was revoked, continued use can be criminal.

3) The Cardholder Told Me I Could “Pay Them Back Later.” Is That a Defense?

Only if you truly had consent at the time of each transaction. “I’ll repay” doesn’t cure unauthorized use.

4) How Does the Felony Trigger Work?

If the aggregate value obtained with the unauthorized card/number exceeds $500 in any six months, the charge can be a Class D felony.

5) Do Refunds or Chargebacks Reduce the Total?

They can. We document returns/reversals to challenge the State’s valuation and degree.

6) Can the State Also Charge Larceny?

Often yes, especially when totals are high; prosecutors may pair card-use counts with larceny by amount.

7) What if a Merchant Ran the Wrong Card on File?

Processor or merchant error is a real issue. We subpoena logs and device fingerprints to test attribution.

8) Will I Go to Jail on a First Offense?

Outcomes vary. With restitution, clean history, and strong mitigation, many first-timers avoid jail.

9) Can I Use the AR Program?

Frequently, yes (fact- and judge-dependent). Early restitution and a mitigation plan improve the odds of dismissal and erasure.

10) Should I Talk to the Bank’s or Store’s Investigator?

Not without counsel. Seemingly harmless admissions (“I used it once”) can satisfy key elements.

What to Do Right Now
  • Do not make statements about authorization or intent.
  • Preserve receipts, texts/emails, app logs, and any proof of consent.
  • Document refunds/chargebacks to contest valuation.
  • Call counsel early so we can control communications and build your defense.
Call to Action

Being investigated or charged under C.G.S. § 53a-128d? I move fast to challenge authorization, valuation, and attribution, and to position you for AR or another non-conviction outcome whenever possible.
Call (203) 357-5555 or reach me through the Contact Page for a confidential strategy session. Attorney Allan F. Friedman has over 30 year of experience defending credit card crimes.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous