C.G.S. § 53a-97 – Custodial Interference in the First Degree
Overview Connecticut treats interference with a child’s lawful custody very seriously—especially when a child is taken out of state or put at risk. Under C.G.S. § 53a-97, a person commits Custodial Interference in the First Degree when they commit custodial interference (second degree) and either remove the child from Connecticut or expose the child to a risk that their safety or health will be endangered. This offense is a Class D felony.
Domestic-Violence Designation:Because these cases almost always involve parents, relatives, or household members, they are frequently classified as family-violence (domestic) cases. In practice, courts steer these matters to the Family Violence Education Program (FVEP) rather than Accelerated Rehabilitation (AR). When the case is handled as family-violence, FVEP—not AR—is typically the diversion path that can lead to dismissal and erasure upon successful completion.
Elements the State Must ProveTo convict under § 53a-97, the State must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that:
- Custodial Interference (Second Degree) occurred — you, without legal right, took, enticed, kept, or withheld:
- a child under 16 (or an incompetent person) from the child’s lawful custodian; or
- as a relative of a child under 16, you intended to hold the child permanently or for a protracted period from the lawful custodian; and
- One aggravating factor:
- You removed the child from Connecticut; or
- You exposed the child to a risk that the child’s safety would be endangered or their health would be impaired.
Penalties- Class D Felony
- Prison: Up to 5 years
- Fine: Up to $5,000
- Probation: Possible (often with conditions tied to family-court compliance, counseling, and no-contact/return provisions)
Collateral consequences can include immigration impacts, licensing issues, protective orders, and significant effects in family-court custody and visitation proceedings.
Domestic-Violence Handling & Protective OrdersWhen designated as family violence, you will be placed on the Family Violence Docket. Expect:
- A next-day arraignment and an interview with Family Relations.
- Immediate issuance of a criminal protective order (full no-contact, residential stay-away, or partial).
- Ongoing court monitoring and counseling requirements while the case is pending.
- The defense can later move to modify the protective order when circumstances stabilize and Family Relations supports it.
Programs & Alternatives (Family-Violence Focus)- Family Violence Education Program (FVEP):
This is the standard diversion route in family-violence custodial-interference cases. If granted and successfully completed, the case is dismissed and erased. Admission is discretionary and typically requires a strong mitigation package (stable housing/employment, counseling, a safety plan, and cooperation with family-court orders).
- Accelerated Rehabilitation (AR):
While AR can sometimes apply in non-family-violence settings, family-violence custodial-interference cases are generally directed to FVEP rather than AR. If the case is not designated family-violence (unusual in this context), AR may be explored as a fallback. - Family-Court Coordination:
Parallel work in family court—temporary orders, parenting plans, supervised exchanges—often helps secure FVEP admission or a favorable resolution.
Common Real-World Scenarios- A parent keeps a child beyond parenting time and drives out of Connecticut to prevent the return.
- A relative picks up a child from school and refuses to return the child to the custodial parent.
- One parent withholds the child during a dispute, and circumstances suggest the child’s safety/health is at risk.
Defense Strategies- No violation of a “lawful custodian”: Orders were unclear, modified, or the other party lacked lawful custody.
- No intent / misunderstanding: Scheduling mistakes, miscommunications, or reasonable reliance on counsel.
- No aggravator: No out-of-state removal and no safety/health risk (supports reduction to second degree).
- Safety justification: Immediate action taken to protect the child from imminent harm, with prompt contact to court/DCF/police.
- Order ambiguity / due process: Conflicting or insufficiently served orders.
- Proof problems: Texts/emails/GPS contradict the timeline or show efforts to return the child.
What Prosecutors Focus On- Clarity and validity of custody/visitation orders
- Intent to withhold beyond lawful rights
- Out-of-state travel or planning to evade return
- Evidence of risk to safety/health (medical notes, living conditions)
- Communications showing planning or concealment
Evidence That Helps Your Defense- Certified custody/visitation orders and any modifications
- Texts/emails showing consent, logistics, or attempts to return
- Location data (phone, tolls, GPS) proving movements and timing
- Medical/therapeutic records supporting a safety-based decision
- Witness statements confirming non-evasive intent and cooperation
Related OffensesFAQsIs Leaving Connecticut With My Child Always A Felony?Leaving the state can elevate second-degree custodial interference to first degree if the other elements are met.
If This Is a Family-Violence Case, Can I Still Use AR?Typically, no. Family-violence custodial-interference cases are generally routed to FVEP, not AR.
What if I Genuinely Believed My Child Was In Danger?A safety justification can be a powerful defense if the danger was imminent and you promptly sought help from the court/DCF/police.
Will This Affect My Custody Case?Almost certainly. Criminal allegations can influence family-court orders; coordinated strategy is critical.
Can the Protective Order Be Changed So I Can See My Child?Often yes, after compliance and with Family Relations’ support. Your lawyer can file a motion to modify.
What to Do NextIf you’re being investigated or charged under C.G.S. § 53a-97, act quickly. Early intervention lets us stabilize the family-court side, protect your record, and pursue FVEP to position the case for dismissal and erasure.
Call Attorney Allan F. Friedman at (203) 357-5555 or use my online contact form for a confidential consultation. Let’s protect your rights, your record, and your relationship with your child.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous