C.G.S. § 53a-63 — Reckless Endangerment in the First Degree
DefinitionA person commits Reckless Endangerment in the First Degree when, with extreme indifference to human life, they recklessly engage in conduct that creates a risk of serious physical injury to another person. No actual injury is required — the focus is on the level of danger created and the reckless, high-risk mindset.
Elements the State Must Prove- The defendant acted recklessly (consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk);
- The conduct showed extreme indifference to human life; and
- The conduct created a risk of serious physical injury (risk of death, disfigurement, or long-term loss/impairment of health or bodily function).
Penalties- Class A misdemeanor
- Up to 1 year in jail
- Fine up to $2,000
- Probation possible (often with conditions like counseling, community service, or firearm restrictions)
- Family-violence track & protective orders may apply if the incident involves a household/family member
Common Scenarios- Handling or brandishing a firearm in a crowded or confined space.
- High-risk driving or stunts around pedestrians or passengers.
- Leaving a loaded firearm accessible to a child or intoxicated person.
- Setting off powerful fireworks or explosives near occupied buildings.
Examples- Loaded handgun on the coffee table during a party: After drinking, a host leaves a chambered handgun on a low table while guests — including children — mill around. No one is hurt, but the combination of a loaded weapon, alcohol, and ready access can be viewed as extreme indifference creating a risk of serious physical injury.
- Street “donuts” around bystanders: A driver spins the car in tight circles in a crowded parking lot, with friends filming only feet away. Even without a crash, the maneuver creates a serious-injury risk to nearby people and can satisfy the statute.
- Fireworks lit under a wooden porch: To “prank” a neighbor, someone ignites a high-output firework beneath an occupied porch. The proximity to occupants and combustible materials poses a substantial, unjustifiable risk of severe burns or structural fire.
- Mechanical failure, not recklessness: A driver’s steering locks due to a sudden mechanical defect, causing the car to veer near pedestrians. Evidence shows no prior warning signs and that the driver had maintained the vehicle. Without a conscious disregard of a known risk, the recklessness/extreme indifference elements are not met.
Related OffensesDefense & Resolution Strategies- Mens rea (state of mind): Show there was no conscious disregard of a known, substantial risk; highlight safety steps taken, lack of alcohol/drugs, and contextual factors.
- “Extreme indifference” challenge: Argue the conduct, while careless, did not rise to the high threshold of extreme indifference to human life.
- Risk level: Demonstrate the situation did not create a risk of serious physical injury (distance, barriers, unloaded firearm, safety devices, expert reconstruction).
- Causation & identification: Use video, witness inconsistencies, and forensics to challenge the narrative.
- Suppression & procedure: Contest unlawful stops, searches, or statements; preserve and demand bodycam/dashcam footage.
Negotiation pathways- Seek reduction to § 53a-64 (Second Degree) or to non-endangerment misdemeanors (Breach of Peace, Disorderly Conduct) when facts support lower risk.
- Advocate for tailored protective orders that avoid unnecessary hardship while ensuring compliance.
Diversionary optionsFAQsDo they have to prove someone was actually hurt?No. The State must prove a risk of serious physical injury, not an actual injury.
What’s the difference between First and Second Degree Reckless Endangerment?First Degree requires extreme indifference to human life and a risk of serious physical injury; Second Degree involves a risk of physical injury without the “extreme indifference” component.
Can this be a family-violence case?Yes, if it involves family or household members. That can trigger protective orders and open the door to FVEP where appropriate.
Will a conviction affect my firearms rights?While it’s a misdemeanor, judges can impose firearm-related conditions during probation, and incidents involving weapons can impact permit/licensing reviews.
Is AR really an option?Often yes, for those who qualify and where facts are appropriate. Successful completion of AR typically leads to dismissal.
Call to ActionA § 53a-63 arrest is serious because prosecutors argue your conduct showed extreme indifference and a serious-injury risk. We move fast to preserve video, secure witness statements, test the risk level with experts, and pursue AR, FVEP, or charge reductions where possible.
Call (203) 357-5555 or fill out my contact form for a free, confidential consultation. We defend clients across Connecticut and fight to protect your record, your rights, and your future.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Attorney Friedman is the best!! He was extremely helpful and put me at ease with staying on top of my case leaving me with little to worry about. He is hardworking and was extremely flexible with my work schedule in setting up appointments and phone calls. His worth ethic, compassion, and fair price point really set him apart! Raul M.
★★★★★
Not only does Allan give exceptional legal advice, but he also takes the time to get to know his clients on an individual level. He is always available to answer questions, and he is truly dedicated to achieving a fair outcome in each case he is presented with. Knowledgeable, professional & compassionate. Highly recommend! Jennifer S.
★★★★★
Allan has been my personal attorney for over 10 years. He is creative, had working, dedicated, tenacious, and incredibly reliable. I highly recommend him, please don’t hesitate to contact him for service. George K.
★★★★★
I would highly recommend Attorney Allan F. Friedman to anyone seeking counsel in Connecticut. He represented our family's interests in a very professional, fair and effective way. I would give him my highest endorsement. Greg S.
★★★★★
Absolutely Exceptional Attorney. I give Allan a 10 out of 5 - he is that good and far beyond excellent!!! Allan handled my traffic matter with the highest level of professionalism, empathy and efficiency that anyone could ever ask for… Jose
★★★★★
This man literally saved my life! I had a criminal mischief and domestic charge along with a protective order put on me. Atty Friedman successfully got me into the required needed to have these charges dropped. Then came the felony protective order violation...Long story short I walked out of court today with all my charges nolled. Anonymous